Posted by
Logical Party on Monday, June 02, 2008 12:00:00 AM
I am trying to understand this concept of misogyny; is it when a female candidate has more votes than a male candidate yet loses the nomination? Or when a female candidate wins large states by 10% and yet only receives a 3% differential in delegates awarded? Or when a liberal media feels she is not liberal enough and has declared her demise more times than Mark Twain? Or when long time male colleagues in Congress feel threatened she might be in charge and throw their support for her male opponent? Yes that means the ungrateful backstabbing, neantherdahl Hispanic American Bill Richardson, former Ambassador under the Clinton administration.
Is it misogyny when caucus states weigh as much as primaries and count for 75% of those states delegates against the female opponent when only 1% of the state populace voted? Is it misogyny when the allocation method used served to deny a female candidate who would have been the nominee two months ago under the historical winner take all method (suspicious it changed with first legitimate female candidate)? Is it misogyny when she is demeaned for carrying on her campaign into June when previous male counterparts had done so with no qualm?
To paraphrase, we should judge a person by the content of their character, not their genitalia. I’m surprised, most men do love their mother; what is the problem? Elton john was so right; America thinks it has come so far; guess again. Shame on the Democrat party.