About Us

Name: Logical Party
Biography
Name:
Email: gezl@wrinse.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Hollywood - Put up and Shut up!

 

I listened to the audacity of Hollywood elites like Sharon Stones and Justin Timberlake who have told Americans they need to buckle down and volunteer more while they dine on foo foo cuisine and fly from one mansion to another. What have they done?

Here are privileged people playing in their "make believe," fantasy world, on a sound set for three months, or touring the country singing, then lounging out poolside for another three, working on their physical image two hours a day.

The audacity of telling people who already work two jobs, or have multiple spouse working households they need to do more, or buckle down is audacious and absurd. Millions of people volunteer their time and/or service to local charities, food shelters and aid to the homeless, people who don't make multi million dollar salaries while others earn minimum wage, surviving on government subsistence.

What of Hollywood's collective conscience that one person makes so much money acting in their pretend world while others can't make ends meet? The pip squeak Timberlake who's blood, sweat and tears to date was to sing in a boy band and partially disrobe Janet Jackson has some nerve. He knows nothing of what real people do day to day being so far removed, so superficial and childish he claims to have a "swagger" because of the election of Obama, before the President has accomplished anything.

We have many soldiers giving the ultimate sacrifice in foreign lands protecting our freedoms and luxuries at home. I am reminded of those actors and actresses who stopped what they were doing to enlist during the World Wars, and of the Hall of Fame pitcher Sal Maglie who could have stayed in America and had greater numbers, except that he felt there were more important things then playing a ballgame. What has Hollywood done in this regard?

I am sure that many in Hollywood already give under the precipes set forth by Matthew 6:24: "sound no trumpet before you ...that you may be prasised by others." I know of many who are concerned with their fellow citizens plight, like Springsteen and Bono, and I will never forget Sandra Bullock's donation of one million dollars towards the families that died on 9/11. Pray this epidemic catches on.

The last thing we Americans need is a lecture. We are the masses who feel the economic pain first, and feel the benefit, if any last. Mesasage to Hollywood: put action to your words and preach by example!


David DiBello

 

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Right Man For The Times

It is fully understandable and historical to witness a barrier finally broken that was long since overdue, the electing of our first Black President. Even more unifying is the fact that Barack Obama is biracial at a time when we trully need to realize we are all on the same side in solving the ills of this country.
 
Black Americans have had achievements that were not acknowledged in the distant past. Thanks to the struggle for Civil Rights, justice and equality enjoined by White Americans this road to recognition is realized.
 
It is also importatnt to acknowledge again, that a majority of White Americans voted for Barack Obama not because it was time for a Black President, but because President Obama was the right man for the job and for the times.
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Clear Vision in DramaticTimes

I am so proud today to have voted for Barack even though I supported Hillary. His speech was the best I have ever heard because it hit on all notes. Gone is the aberration of wealth redistribution, but stated better America as a whole can only prosper when all people, even the people who work hard to create profits for others, share in the good fortune.
 
I hope not lost in the aura of the moment was the substance of his message. This is going to be a long haul to recovery, especially after today's market downturn, and it is not going to be easy. It will require sacrifice, something my generation is not used to after the decade of greed in the eighties and another supply side crash and burn now. This is not the start of a Piñata from the goody tree. 
 
Barack dramatically reminded us that we are a nation built on hard and sometimes unknown times, we never quit and did not fail, whether at the time of our founding, or during a depression and World Wars, or the Cuban Missile crisis and Cold war. We will not fail now provided we take the steps necessary. 
 
Barack also reminded all countries that we remain at peace with all those who choose to do the same, and we will act more prudently and judiciously as we regain our leadership role. This too is a challenge to other countries to join us in peace, but to make no mistake that America will tolerate any less.
 
I can only add God Bless America, for we finally have a populist President and administration that will handle the problems as if we actually are all created equal and "one nation under God."
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Acknowledging Our First Bi Racial President!

Thankfully we will begin our National period of Hope and Change and what better way to start then with an open, honest, truthfulness. That would mean acknowledging the reality of the moment and not whatever our desires or the media want to display.

That truth is Barack Obama is our first Black President and our Forty-fourth White one. Our longing to break a mold and “overcome” by finally electing a Black President should not foreshadow the truth.

Barack came from a broken home, his Black Father abandoning his family, eventually returning for a one week stay and then leaving to pursue misogynistic endeavors ending in a drunken car crash. The most influential, supportive, consistent people in his life were the white maternal part of the family, which he often gratefully acknowledges. Why don’t we?

We have finally accepted the psychological community’s definition of what makes a healthy family; positive reinforcement by parents, and unconditional love. I would imagine in a biracial household there is no acknowledgements of differences, because none is seen; only love.

Based on our country’s ancient prejudiced, bigoted and racial past, mixed race children assimilated with others of “color,” because White Americans would not “accept” anyone with a hint of skin tone differential. This is a half truth, since many Black Americans also were prejudiced to those who claimed to be black, yet “caramel” in appearance; not black enough. In extreme situations where attitudes and political beliefs didn’t match what “the community” had in mind, they were damned as “Uncle Tom’s.”

The confusing part for White Americans is why they don’t get a ‘shout out” for their part in raising a child? Why is Halle Berry the first Black actress to win an Academy award when her mother Judith is white, her father Jerome black? Whoopi Goldberg speaks in her monologues of the “black community,” and has acknowledged being a Jewish-Catholic girl from New York, her mother white and father black. What of Alicia Keyes, Lisa Bonet and Lenny Kravitz, whose mother Roxie Roker portrayed the very life she lived in an interracial marriage on the Jeffersons.

It seems disrespectful to the White parent to be overlooked and for White Americans to keep them and their influence in the closet. One is confused thinking Mrs. Berry must have thought “what about me?” when her daughter received an award for portraying the biracial actress Dorothy Dandridge.

Of course within the interracial family, recognition is not a component, only the aforementioned values of unconditional love, and the desire for their children to grow up healthy and happy.

Only when we acknowledge the truth will our differences die. And to take a page out of Whoopi’s monologue, it is only when we start referring to one another as Americans, not White or Black that our differences will disappear. To quote St. John, “the truth shall free you.” If we want to be honest to virtues of Hope and Change, then let’s start by acknowledging the events of the day: we have our first bi racial President and it couldn’t have come at a better time.

David DiBello

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blagojevich, the Gambler

I wonder if Kipling and Tennyson had Gov Blagojevich in mind when writing their poems regarding enduring hardships. Surely if they had more foresight these poets would have added to their advice regarding life's trials, tribulations and injustices the caveat, "unless caught on tape."
 
My advice to Gov. Blagojevich for his next press conference is to quote from Kenny Roger's the Gambler song: "You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em. Know when to walk away, and know when to run."
 
David DiBello
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We are Now Concerned about Candidate's Clothing Allocation?

Obviously bad decision on the RNC's part to purchase all Sarah's clothes at once, especailly while espousing "brotherhood with Joe," but even "Six Pack" and "the Plumber" know how to dress when attending a wedding, their own or another's.
 
Have we gone from revealing a candidates tax return to detailing their clothing allowance? How much has Barack, Joe and John spent on their clothes?
 
Shouldn't we expect a VP candidate to dress the part? Is it that much money given the budgets? If one divides $150,000 by $21 million, the amount Barack has spent on polling, would we blink an eye? The campaign funds are now in the "BBBBBBillion dollar range, so if 1% were allocated to clothing, that would leave a spending allotment of $10 million dollars. $150,000 is 1.5% of that amount.
 
Even Dave the Accountant spends more money on clothes.
 
We have a Left Wing attack group led by Chris Matthews high standards of speech Sarah should have hade before second graders (should she have gone into detail about the clouture rule, or fillibusters - any thinking adult would be logically confused).
 
We have Keith "the sportscaster" Olberman laughing nightly at something only he finds amusing or defines as such, and lectured by Bill "I beat my African American Girlfriend within an inch of her life in a coke induced rage" Maher, regarding right and wrong.
Too bad they both couldn't stick to issues instead of these sophomoric locker room attacks. 
 
A word of warning to Obama: no matter how bad the economy, your surrogates are making it very hard to vote for you.
 
David DiBello
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SEAN HANNITY – UNIFORMED OR JUST LYING?

 

SEAN HANNITY – UNIFORMED OR JUST LYING?

I’d be the first to drive Alec Baldwin to the airport next time he has a political tantrum, but the drama graduate might have hit upon something suggesting dual college dropout Sean Hannity spent too much time in Construction and not enough time reading an economics book.

Hannity’s latest pro business propaganda is that small businesses will pass on taxes to the consumer. In other words, owners will say “how dare you tax me, now take this sucker,” to the very market he wishes to attract. Is this cutting your nose to spite your face?

As a Financial Controller in small business for twenty five years, I know something about finances. Small business from its inception pays little to no taxes because it is working off start up investments as costs. A small business owner contributes their own capital, and once a bank is secure with an owner’s equity stake in the company, extends financing and a line of credit to purchase equipment and essentials to conduct business.

Most businesses do not turn a profit in the first few years of its existence, surviving off its startup funds and bank credit. There are no profits, so there are no taxes!

There are enough business deductions, loss carry forwards and ACRS depreciation (Accelerated Cost Recovery System) for those operating under the accrual accounting method to write off capital expenditures faster than its economic life, again allowing for no profits even if shown on their income statement.

However, this isn’t required because businesses are allowed to keep two sets of books – accrual for financial statements and cash basis for taxes, writing off all capital expenditures immediately. This allows a business to keep a bank happy regarding their risk due to profits, and allows more time to a company before paying taxes.

The most important feature of small business is that a majority are “S” Corporations –owners who use the corporate shield as protection against liability but whose profits are passed along to the owner who pays taxes at lower individual rates.

Hannity believes small business will fight any attempt at EVER paying taxes by extortion, inflating the price of their product or service out of the market with a tax pass-along’s once profitable. This is understandable if taxes were a fixed rate regardless of profit, but it is only a percentage of profit, which means an owner will always be ahead, unless greed (not enough profit) is factored into the equation. In that case, my suggestion to business is put your “big boy” pants on and pay your patriotic obligation like all we “average Joe’s.”

Sean further ascribes to the “look at the hand at the end of your arm” belief system in compassionate conservatism when it comes to “hand outs.” While we are all “created equal” in terms of dignity, we deviate as far as IQ and ability. Many come from broken, abusive or poor homes, have no resources and are not blessed with the upbringing of the St Pius X high school graduate Hannity.

My suggestion to Sean is to lose the diatribe and practice some humility; and crack open a business book or two before speaking.

David DiBello

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It’s Audacious for Republicans to Complain

 

It’s Audacious for Republicans to Complain

The McCain camp and Republicans are now spreading fear that Democrats in control of the Presidency and both houses of Congress is a danger to Americans because they will remain unchecked and shape policy as they see fit. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t that what the Republican Party had for the 6 years from January 2001 to January 2007?

Many also criticize Democrats for not doing anything during the 1 and ½ years they were in charge of the House and Senate (barely) failing to mention that the Veto power remained in a Republican President’s hands stymieing all Democrat efforts, not possessing a super majority to overturn veto’s or overcome the cloture rule in the Senate requiring 60 votes to avoid filibuster.

Isn’t it time for another party to have a chance at running government and getting things done on behalf of the people? Perhaps the Republican Party is subconsciously saying of Democrats what they know true of themselves – unchecked, corruption flourishes. Look at Tom Delay, Denny Hastert, Ted Stevens, Jack Abramoff, Scooter Libby (who fell on his sword at Cheney’s request), Randy “Duke” Cunningham, all of whom served at great sacrifice on behalf of the American people, leveraging their power to personally and financially flourish, making their sacrifice a scam.

Add to it out of control behavior of Bittars, Craig, Foley and Fossella and maybe it is time for a change, placing people in charge who will take the business of the American People seriously and not look at Congress as their own little playground, where they feel above the law and preoccupied with their own gravitas.

A Republican President and Republican Congress have put us in this current economic supply side mess, reversing the Glass-Steagall act led by anti-whiner Phil Gramm, tightening personal bankruptcy laws but overlooking usury of credit institutions, and creating a Medicare prescription drug plan after efforts to block purchases of drugs from overseas failed. This is ironic from a party that believes in the law of supply and demand, and underscores their preoccupation with business and the rich over the good of all Americans.

The Republicans are really afraid that it’s no longer their turn, and they can no longer line their pockets with measures and bills that are pro business, pro wealthy and anti American worker. They must learn to work and play well with others.

David DiBello

RESEARCH FOOTNOTES

cloture - The only procedure by which the Senate can vote to place a time limit on consideration of a bill or other matter, and thereby overcome a filibuster. Under the cloture rule (Rule XXII), the Senate may limit consideration of a pending matter to 30 additional hours, but only by vote of three-fifths of the full Senate, normally 60 votes.

The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in the United States and included banking reforms, some of which were designed to control speculation.[1] Some provisions such as Regulation Q, which allowed the Federal Reserve to regulate interest rates in savings accounts, were repealed by the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980. Provisions that prohibit a bank holding company from owning other financial companies were repealed on November 12, 1999, by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NO WAY, NO HOW, NOBAMA!

Hillary showed off her life long experience and devotion last night with a wonderfully powerful "to the point, laying the facts on the line" speech, which will be underscored by Bill Clinton, who possesses the "Kavorkya" when it comes to political discourse. They have displayed one fact - buyers' remorse that this Democrat party deserves.

Hillary showed she knows all the facts, and during the debate season knew how to respond with truthfulness as to handling this country's problems, especially with regard to the Iraq war (Biden agrees with Hillary, mind you). Unfortunately, this Democrat party was hijacked by the radical left wing who can't handle the truth!

They are going down the McGovern Carter yellow brick road that “wishes problems away” in the hope the world would just suddenly “be the way it should be” like magic, while polls show Hillary with a 49-43 advantage over McCain as Barack's lead slips to a dead heat.

One good thing will come from this convention; we can now tell our children if they run a lemonade stand, they too can become President, because we are nominating a community organizer with the background credentials of Sonny Carson.

Fortunately, the Democrats will control both houses of Congress with large margins, tying the hands of a Republican President. Vote McCain and wait for the 2012 train to undo the mess the Democrats (and Hillary) have made now.

David DiBello

 

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This is Barack's Judghment?

In his wisdom or ego, Barack thought it best not to consider Hillary as VP though 50% of the Democrat vote lies in her supporters' hands? Is this intelligent?
 
Regardless of what a good selection he made, Joe Biden and Barack will have an uphill struggle to put those votes in their column, many of whom are centrist and will simply revolt to McCain despite Hillary's protestations to the contrary; you can't tell voters how to act, and if they feel disresepcted, the die is cast.
 
Instead of focusing on Independents and crossover Republicans, Biden and Barack will be spending time stopping the hemorraghing of Clintonians. Hopefully they will convince these disaffected voters that the Democrat platform is more conducive to their needs.
 
However, with a projected overwhleming victory by Democrats in Senate and Congressional races which will tie the hands of A McCain Presidency, perhaps Clinton supporters will roll the dice for 2012, seeing that ticket splitting will do no harm because of a lame duck Republican President from day one.
 
A Hillary selection would have energized the masses, thrown the convention wild, unlike Biden, who garnered 250,000 primary votes. The novelty of his selection will fade fast. To further show what an unwise choice Democrats made, can you imagine an experienced Hillary teamed up with a seasoned Biden. It would be no contest.
 
One still wonders what deal was struck with Hillary anbd Barack for her to walk away so easily? Shouldn't she have had leverage with the other half of the primary vote, or was it Barack holding the threat of "her never getting elected in the future" if she didn't support him now?
 
We are left with the battle cries of inexperienced at the top of the ticket, who has already floored us with his shortsighted judgment.
 
David DiBello
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

“There was an Old Senator”

 

“There was an Old Senator”

By David DiBello

There was an old Senator

Who need not live in a shoe

Fact he had so many homes

Was it many or just a few?

He felt three million dollars

Was just petty cash

And those growths on his skin

Were all part of a rash

He served our country

With dignity and pride

And came home to celebrate

With a girl on the side

He once was associated

With the Keating Five

At a point in his life

When he wanted to run and hide

He thought the economy

Was doing just fine

And all those complaints

Nothing more than a sour whine?

He wants Oil Companies

To drill, drill, drill

While consumers and taxpayers

All foot the bill

Against Bush Tax cuts

But then changed his mind

A balanced budget

Is for a faraway time

And a hundred year war

Is all part of the deal

As Republicans gear for Election Day

And another big steal?

David DiBello

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Edwards Affair will lead to scrutiny of first Mrs. McCain

I feel sorry for Mrs. Edwards and family, and for the Love child (father To Be Named later), and for the first Mrs. McCain who will now become focus of media scrutiny since John McCain was having an affair with Cindy at the end of his first marriage.
 
The situations will not be similar (one marriage was nearing an end), but I'm sure the Times and other outlets will make it an issue and respond to hypocrisy if the right wing continually criticze Edwards and not let matter drop. McCain would be wise to remain silent.
 
Also, while the matter of character is debated (Edwards has confirmed his behavior despicable and that he is a narcissist - like Giuliani) the real issue is judgment! Edwards chose to have an affair while running for President! Clinton chose to have an affair while in the Oval Office! If that's their decision making criteria, thank God they are not in charge.
 
David DiBello
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AGAIN IT’S LIMOSINE LIBERALS POOR JUDGMENT

It’s the Inaugural Ball 2009 and introductions are being made; “Ladies and gentlemen, the Vice President and Mrs. Edwards, and Mrs. Edwards-elect, Riley Hunter!” The man who aspired to one of the highest offices in the world failed to do a projection of his narcissism. In his best thinking he determined his running for President would be a good time to start an affair.

I would think there are better forms of stress reduction than adultery, and the path he chose is now creating even more tension, as he goes from potential VP selection to political oblivion. Is this the thought process adhered to by the often spoken about mill working father? Is it possible while thinking of his circumstances, his wife Elizabeth might be saying “hey buddy, I’m the one who’s dying here?” How’s that for stress.

The male ego, gluttony and greed: three recipes for disaster, or an overinflated sense of self worth at the expense of all and everybody else. Is this the man we want in charge of National Security and our Economic interests?

It’s sad because this is a man who had promise and potential, and talked a good game. He stood for the oppressed and working class and talked if their struggle was his own. He was a man of humble beginnings and allegedly equal mindset. He reminds us of another populist leader, Sen. Ted Kennedy, who stood for the downtrodden and oppressed minorities, people he would never have over his home for dinner, but would let prune his shrubbery and mow his lawn. A Senator, as history has shown, suffers from the same disease to a criminal extent. Can you say “Chappa…Chappa….” Thankfully he had Cousin William K. Smith and a Palm Beach resort to recoup from further escapades.

During the Bill Clinton travesty, Edwards called the President’s behavior “despicable;” be careful at whom you throw stones. This brings us to mind the actions of the 42nd President, a lifelong philanderer and sexual addict (how convenient) whose professional judgment was to receive some oral gratification while on the phone to Yassar Arafat. How kinky! One can understand how a President can’t show up at the local Motel Six, but wouldn’t it have been wiser to find another spot than the Oval office, not to mention time better spent arresting Osama Bin Laden?

Elliot “not to be confused with Ness” Spitzer, after enduring years of a stick figure, narrowed jaw and hallowed hairline thought the fruits of his labor finally paid off – he can get some! Who cares that he would lock up others for doing the same, blurring the line between cop and criminal?

It’s an allergy that our staid Republicans have picked up on over the years, what with Mayor “comb over” Giuliani having multiple affairs before finally getting one that clicked, Senator Vitter’s (Louisiana) idea of a men’s club as congregating with anything but men while New Orleans sank, and Sen. Craig practicing his hand signs in a men’s room while writing his next anti gay manifesto.

House pages and congressional staff are prey for politicians and all at risk. One day they might be in a position to return the favor in blackmail against the elected officials who hold this nation’s security and purse strings in their palms.

We are electing men who can’t keep it in their pants. Carrying the mantle of office holder with Americans interest at stake is not enough of a challenge, enough of a prize; the title of office holder seen as the greatest ice breaker to getting into another’s pants.

What about the sanctity of the American trust? What about virtue, and high ideals and values, or doing what one was hired to do?

Hey, whatever works!

David DiBello

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New Yorker Uses Fear As Satire

The New Yorker has attempted to dilute the irrational beliefs of certain segments of the electorate by poking fun at the Obama myths. Although one understands the satire, it doesn't mean we need to see it or proliferate its thoughts or ideologies of critics. Many will interpret it as underscoring their inane beliefs.
  
Their cover has always been satirical, but they went to a level of stupidity with the last one. In short, it was stupid, but like sex, stupid sells. A look at our current crop of celebrities only confirms this behavior. And judging from magazine sales, the New Yorker needs a whole lot of stupid, which is exactly what has been happening with the circulation sales of this week's edition.
 
As Bernard McGuirk, Imus' producer said on O'Reilly Wednesday night, had the satire been about McCain regarding his age, or liver spots, or heroism, or short fuse, no one would have said a thing, because we would interpret it as obvious satire, having known McCain for some time now, and having his actions overcome any satire.

With Obama and spouse, we don't know them as long, so many misconceptions already exist, and any satire about them cuts at that fine line between being humorous, or perhaps a bit of the truth. A large part of the electorate still believes he took his oath of office for the Senate on a Koran, while a larger segment believes he is a Muslim in spite of the controversy over Rev Wright and Barack's 25 year association with his Church. Which is it?

Therefore, when satirizing the Obama's, there is sensitivity between the truth and fiction, and any attempt at humor is seen as playing upon people's fears.
David DiBello
The Logical Party
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »